Welcome, Congress, to our generation’s electric sun.
Earlier, I had posted the Wikileaks link to these congressional reports with comments of my own but I thought I would pen down a few thoughts as I finally electronically leafed through some of them. These reports remind me a little bit of another set of reports that are publicly available, which are the Congressional Quarterly reports, which are an excellent resource for research. They are a bit dry but provide a wealth of information and perhaps more important, citations to law cases, journalist articles, and academic pieces (everything that journalistic pieces, in other words, do not do). It does 1/2 the research for you, as I like to think.
The few reports I have scanned from the leaks remind me, in fact, of the CQ reports, in content, style and tone. And while I thought CQ reports published on a wide range of topics, these semi-private reports are far more extensive in terms of topics and far more specific as well:
CRS: Humane Treatment of Farm Animals: Overview and Issues, December 10, 2008
CRS: FDA’s Authority to Ensure That Drugs Prescribed to Children Are Safe and Effective, December 2, 2008
CRS: African American Members of the United States Congress: 1870-2008, December 4, 2008
CRS: The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers, January 13, 2009
CRS: Selected Legal and Policy Issues Related to Coalbed Methane Development, March 9, 2004
I look forward to hearing/learning more about how they are used (I can’t imagine that each report is read by many) and why exactly they were hidden away as they don’t seem to be the type of information that should be kept classified.
I saw the chronological list of documents, many were copyright related which I am sure to browse, but one thing that seemed missing is a context. What was happening in the US or world around the date of each document what would provide a context for the creation and need of that particular report? Would that date and historical context provide an insight into what the administration was considering?
Comment by Kevin Mark — February 9, 2009 @ 2:00 am